In this exciting competition, undergraduate and graduate students are invited to create a multi-disciplinary team to build a planetary rover prototype and demonstrate its capabilities to perform a series of competitive tasks in field tests at the NASA Johnson Space Center’s Rock Yard in June 2013.

Interview With Worcester Polytechnic Insitute,

| Worcester Polytechnic Insitute

We were fortunate to be given the opportunity to show off some of the leading entries into the RASC-AL Exploration Robo-Ops Competition. Here are 5 of the design reports and some follup interviews with the team members:

West Virginia University - Interview

University of Nebraska-Lincoln - Interview

University of Utah - Interview

FAMU/FSU College of Engineering - Interview

Worcester Polytechnic Institute - Interview

Now at the midway point for the Robo-Ops competition how is your project coming along?

The project is coming along great. The two robots that we will be competing with are both assembled and functioning. We have been running a number of field tests with the micro-rover to evaluate how it would perform under competition settings. On ORYX, we have fabricated a few new components including a redesigned top plate aimed at reducing overall weight. We have also been running both robots together, and building up our competition strategy based on this novel two-rover system.

What adjustments or changes have you made from the original plan you submitted back in December?

Since December, our micro-rover has undergone a couple of major design revisions. We originally were going to create expandable wheels for the micro-rover, but found that to achieve the necessary strength they would either be too heavy, or prohibitively expensive to manufacture. So instead we designed a static pair of carbon fiber wheels that fit our needs.

What were some of the challenges you have come across on the build thus far and how have you overcome them?

The biggest challenges we have run into is the size and weight constraints. Every time the team comes up with ideas for a new feature or design we have to see if everything will fit the starting configuration, and make sure we don't go overweight. We've also ran into a problem with running low on USB bandwidth. Between ORYX and the micro-rover, we are running four cameras. All the data from the cameras need to pass through OYRX's USB controller. This is approaching the limit that it can handle. We have to be smart with our video compression and resource allocation to avoid problems.

How many man hours do you estimate your team has invested in the project so far?

If we average it out, each person has put in at least 15 hours a week since last September. Thats at least 5100 man hours to date.

What are some of major tasks still yet to come over the next couple months?

We have a lot more testing to do. We want to make sure our operators are comfortable with controlling the rovers in a competition setting. We also have some software feature that we are creating to make it easier for the operators to figure out where and what orientation the rovers are in, as well as add in some safety feature to prevent the rovers from from running into problems the operators wouldn't be able to realize from just looking through the cameras.

Can you tell us a bit about your team, how you recruited, how you organized and how you are working together?

We are always looking for students who would be interested in participating. Recruitment is an ongoing process with interested students participating when they can. Team members and advisors tell people about it in their classes, and we get a good number of people that way. We emphasize that academics come first. Everyone is responsible for committing to only what they can accomplish with their course work, and they aren't expected to over extend themselves just for Robo-Ops. That being said, the team members are quite committed to the competition, and go out of their way to make time to work on the project.

What facilities and equipment do you have at your disposal for the project?

To work on the robots we have a couple of different shared lab spaces that are stocked with all the tools we need for assembling and developing the robots. For manufacturing our campus has three machine shops that we make use of. We have access to many pieces of equipment for rapid prototyping including CNC machines, a laser cutter and 3D printer.

Do you have any advice for future contenders in this type of competition?

Starting early is key. We started the design process for the the rovers well in advance of being selected to compete. Going back and looking at the videos from past years also gives a good idea of what works and what doesn't. There's no reason to repeat the mistakes that teams in the past have made.


Comments (0)

This post does not have any comments. Be the first to leave a comment below.


Post A Comment

You must be logged in before you can post a comment. Login now.

Featured Product

Festo - Complete Mechatronics Motion Solutions

Festo - Complete Mechatronics Motion Solutions

Mechatronic Motion Solutions from Festo is a unique system of components, modules, and software. It integrates all types of pneumatic, servopneumatic and (electro)mechanical automation motion and combines them according to your task. Irrespective of the control system environment you use, Mechatronic Motion Solutions always provides the appropriate interfaces. The fingers can be actively moved and their strength amplified; the operator's hand movements are registered and transmitted to the robotic hand in real time. The objectives are to enhance the strength and endurance of the human hand, to extend humans' scope of action and to secure them an independent lifestyle even at an advanced age.