The design of a vacuum system and choice of vacuum components for robot end effectors can be of crucial importance for a successful robot installation. This paper discusses vacuum solutions for robot end effectors, which increase the possibility of a successful robot installation. At the same time, I would like to resolve the misunderstanding that all vacuum ejectors are expensive to operate.

Vacuum Systems For Successful Robot Implementation

Josef Karbassi | Piab

INTRODUCTION

We live in a world with shortened product life, an increased variety of products and a demand for higher quality on the products. Continuous productivity improvement goes without saying. At the same time, increased safety, reduced environmental impact and better working conditions become more and more important. A successful robot implementation has to improve  the  production  flexibility,  increase throughput or raise the quality of the products and reduce the manufacturing cost. There is also a trend for lower environmental impact from production.
 
Piab is a global company and has been working with industrial vacuum technology for over 40 years. We have and have had several important innovative patents concerning vacuum technology based on ejectors. Technically and organizationally Piab is operating in several market segments such as packaging and automotive. In all of the industries we have  noticed  a  more  frequent  use  of  robots  for material  handling.  The  basic  principles  for  a successful robot implementation using vacuum are similar  for  most  applications  and  industries.  We would like to share our knowledge about how to design vacuum systems for robot end effectors by giving some useful vacuum guidelines related to important matters for successful robot installations.
 

IMPORTANT CRITERIA FOR A ROBOT INSTALLATION

Increased productivity

One way to increase the production rate on a robot material-handling line using vacuum is faster air evacuation of the system so that the robot can start the motion earlier. If it is a leaking system, as when handling porous material, for instance, the ability to maintain a satisfactory vacuum level is equally important.  The   most   effective  system  is   where vacuum is generated as close to the suction cups as possible. Such a system eliminates unnecessary hose volume to be evacuated and the risk of reduced performance due to restrictive piping. This fact excludes mechanical vacuum pumps as a part of an effective vacuum system for end effectors. In spite of that, many companies choose to have a centralized vacuum solution with the pump far away from the suction cups. The reason is weight saving, simplified vacuum  control/management  and   quicker  change over-time for service or component/tool changes.
 
A new, patented technology for building multistage vacuum ejectors in the  form of a  nozzle cartridge with built-in flap valves and filter challenges many of the arguments for a centralized vacuum solution. The nozzle cartridge is made of light materials and can easily be integrated directly into suction cup fittings or   the   boom   structure   of   robot end effectors. Changing or cleaning the cartridge is quick and easy and it can be done without any tools.
 
Fig. 1 – Multistage ejector cartridge for efficient decentralized vacuum systems
 
Choosing an efficient multistage vacuum ejector instead  of  a  single-stage  ejector  can  reduce evacuation time and substantially increase the possibility to speed up cycle times. Clear signals to start a robot motion are usually at vacuum levels between 30 to 50 –kPa [9 to 15 –inHg]. State-of-the- art multistage ejectors are up to twice as fast to reach those levels as compared to single-stage ejectors, with the same air consumption.
 
Fig. 2 - Vacuum flow for a typical single-stage and a multistage low-pressure ejector with the same air consumption [1.92 scfm at 72 respectively 45 psi].
 
Fig. 3 – Response time for evacuation of 1 liter for a single-stage and multistage low-pressure ejector with the same air consumption [1,92 scfm at 72 respectively 45 psi].
 
Another important component, which has an impact on the productivity in a vacuum system, is the suction cup. The quality and material characteristics of the suction cup are crucial. Increased productivity can be achieved by using:
 
  • Suction cups with longer intervals between changes. Durability, wear and oil resistance are the important parameters.
  • Suction cups with high capability to handle shear  forces  from  rapid  acceleration  and retardation. Friction between the suction cup and the surface is important.
  • Suction cups that can handle different types of surfaces and are easy to change. The design of the suction cup/fitting and the hardness of the lip are crucial.

Suction  cups  in  polyurethane  with  a  soft,  high friction, flexible lip and a stable body have proven to be a good choice for increased productivity in many applications. The soft durable lip gives excellent sealing capacity and the stable body a firm grip. Polyurethane has better abrasion and tear resistance than rubbers. It has also higher load bearing capacity and an exceptional elastic memory.

Fig. 4 - Polyurethane cup with dual hardness

More flexibility

Production  flexibility  for  robots  with  a  vacuum system is defined by the ability of handling a large variety of  part  types,  minimized changeover times and  easily  adaptable  capacity.  The  key  vacuum system features for increased flexibility are independent suction cups or sectors of cups. If one or a group of suction cups misses the object, it does not affect the rest of the system. Smart patterns can work on many configurations. Palletizing and depalletizing are robot applications where sectors with suction cups in smart patterns are necessary.

Fig. 5 – Suction cups in smart vacuum patterns are important for flexible palletizing/depalletizing.

A modular vacuum pump design can also increase the flexibility of a robot installation. It should be easy to up-size or down-size the vacuum capacity when needed. One example is the handling of cardboard material  with  varying  permeability.  Suctions  cups that can handle several types of surfaces/objects mean less tool changes and increased flexibility. 

Safety and product quality

For robot applications with a vacuum system, safety and  improved  product  quality  mean  not  loosing and/or damaging the handled part. These are some important vacuum issues for improved safety and product quality:

 

  1. Ejector nozzles should be designed for low and  fluctuating  feed  pressures  with preserved vacuum performance in order to achieve a reliable system. It is common with pressure  fluctuations  due  to  uneven utilization of  compressed air  in  the  plant. The compressor capacity is not always sized for the peak demand. Standard line pressure is 5-6 bar [70-90 psi] but temporary drops to 3-3.5 bar [40-50 psi] are not uncommon. Ejectors designed for 5 or 6 bar [70-90 psi] will lose  a  lot  of  capacity if  the  pressure drops below 4 bar [60 psi]. The result will be suction cups that drop the object handled.



Fig. 6 – Ejectors should be designed for low feed pressures for a more reliable system.

 

  1. The  vacuum  pump(s)  should  continue  to generate vacuum even if the power to the control valves is discontinued. In an airtight system (when handling sheet metal), vacuum pumps should be equipped with non-return valves. If the feeding of compressed air ceases, the system will maintain vacuum for a controllable time.
  2. Suction  cups  with  high  friction  on  oily surfaces should be used. The ability to withstand  high  shear  forces  is  critical  in many robot applications. Proper material and cleat design are the determining factors.
     

Fig. 7 – High material friction and cleats in the suction cups are necessary to withstand high shear forces.

 

  1. Suction cup cleats/foot pattern with the right design are also crucial for eliminating the risk of damages to thin products such as thin aluminum sheets in the car industry.
  2. Use abrasion-resistant material such as polyurethane in suction cups to avoid marks on sensitive products.
  3. Sensing vacuum for a clear signal to start robot motion should be measured as close to the suction cups as possible. Centralized systems with vacuum sensing positioned far away increase the risk of signals at false vacuum levels.  Long vacuum hoses, bends, fittings and vacuum filters create pressure drops. The signal will come too soon and there will be a risk of insufficient lifting capacity in the suction cups when the robot motion starts.
  4. Flow-through silencers should be used on vacuum pumps. They do not stop the flow of particles and jeopardize    the vacuum performance and system safety. Filter type silencers require periodic maintenance, otherwise they will reduce the vacuum performance when they clog.

Reduced  manufacturing  cost  and positive impact on the environment.

Single-stage vacuum ejectors have poor energy economy and should not be used when air consumption is an issue. They can consume up to 300% more compressed air compared to state-of-the- art multistage ejectors used for the same task. An automatic air-saving system should be used in all airtight applications with a reasonable cycle time (> 1 second). The vacuum pump shuts off when a preset vacuum level is achieved. The pump restarts if the vacuum   level drops below start-up level. For instance, up to 90% of the compressed-air consumption in a sheet  metal handling application can be saved with an automatic energy-saving system.

A decentralized vacuum system with several smaller pumps close to the suction cups eliminates the risk of costly over-sized vacuum pumps in order to meet the productivity goals. The energy consumption can be reduced tremendously in many applications by changing to a more decentralized vacuum solution (a fully decentralized system has one vacuum pump per suction cup). Since the pressure difference between the atmosphere and the vacuum level in a system is small (<1 bar, [14.5 psi]), the influence of losses in a centralized vacuum system due to long tiny hoses, bends, fittings, valves, filters, etc., will be great and has to be compensated by increasing the size of the pump. A lot of people make the mistake of applying the same type of system-thinking when they design a vacuum system as when designing compressed air systems.   The   difference   is   that   compressed  air systems are far less sensitive to losses thanks to the high line pressure (5-6 bar [70-90 psi]). An analogy with electrical voltage can be made. Use high “voltage” for long transportations in thin wires and convert to low voltage as late as possible to minimize the losses! The conversion from compressed air to vacuum flow made by the ejector should be made as “late” as possible in the system.

Choosing an efficient multistage ejector will also reduce the noise level compared to non-efficient ejectors and, at the same time, create a more pleasant working environment. The noise level is lower because of more efficient utilization of the energy in the compressed air. The difference can be up to 10-15 dB(A), which means a lot for your ears.

CONCLUSION

In order to have success with a robot installation for material handling with vacuum, there are several things to keep in mind when the system is designed and dimensioned. Piab’s experience is that too many robot  integrators  spend  too  little  time  trying  to optimize the vacuum system. The link between the vacuum system and things such as productivity gain, system safety, flexibility and manufacturing costs, is stronger than many of us believe. However, simple measures such as choosing multistage low-pressure ejectors instead of conventional ejectors, carefully selecting suction cup design and material and also decentralizing to a greater extent will improve the conditions for a successful robot implementation.

Fig. 1 &2 - In many applications several small pumps replacing a centrally placed pump will reduce the energy consumption to half by eliminating vacuum losses.

REFERENCES

(1)   Antony  Barber; “Pneumatic  Handbook  8th Edition”, ISBN 1 85617 249-X, 1997.


Comments (0)

This post does not have any comments. Be the first to leave a comment below.


Post A Comment

You must be logged in before you can post a comment. Login now.

Featured Product

Zimmer Group - THE PREMIUM GRIPPER NOW WITH IO-LINK

Zimmer Group - THE PREMIUM GRIPPER NOW WITH IO-LINK

IO-Link is the first standardized IO technology worldwide for communication from the control system to the lowest level of automation.