We’ve put together a breakdown of the cost of automation, and how to justify it to the leadership team.

The ABC of RPA, Part 5: What Is the Cost of Automation and How Do I Justify It to the Leadership Team?

Rita Brunk | Genfour

 

While robotic process automation offers businesses a whole host of benefits, some organizations are struggling to get the idea past the decision making committee. Cost is, of course, a huge determining factor as to whether an organization chooses to go ahead with a project. We’ve put together a breakdown of the cost of automation, and how to justify it to the leadership team.

 

Related hardware costs based upon the hosting location

Robotic process automation software is best suited to automating processes that are found within core operations. Often, requirements are too tactical or immediate to justify complicated and lengthy IT development. Opting for robotics enables organizations to automate processes quickly and cost effectively. While an onshore full-time equivalent (FTE) costing $50K can be replaced by an offshore FTE for $20K, automation software can perform the same function for $5K or less – without the drawbacks of managing and training offshore labor.

Typically, between 70-80% of rules-based processes can be automated, which means that companies can operate onshore, at a lower cost point than offshore. Keeping business operations onshore means that there is no need to rely on an offshore or outsource partner, so you can maintain absolute control of the throughput. Many companies whom have chosen the outsourcer route are now finding themselves with a lack of understanding of their own processes. In other words, they need to query their outsourcer on how something is done.

 

Development costs

Automation via robot, can be implemented in a number of weeks, and achieves a return on investment quickly, with an average payback time of three to nine months. It doesn’t replace any existing systems and is non-invasive, thus there is no need for existing systems to be re-engineered. In fact, it is even possible to reconsider some ERP projects previously deemed unacceptable due to long payback, by instead developing a robot. Some automation providers offer customers the option to pay as you go, so you can pay once the automation software is in production, delivering you benefit. Many accounting policies will also allow you to capitalize the cost over two to three years.

 

Ongoing costs and licensing

Most robotics software providers will look to sell you a license, or an enterprise license, which for large companies can cost upwards of $1M. A more cost effective option is to trial a number of robotics services companies to see which software is the best fit for your business.

Unlike other cloud based ERP/ applications, there are no ongoing professional services other than maintaining the license that are required. You may choose to have a minimal amount of training for your team in the beginning so that development of subsequent robots goes smoother. In addition, unless you plan to build your own robotics staff, you may choose to have the service provider maintain your robot at a fairly reasonable cost.

 

Cost savings and cost avoidance

You will need to take into account the costs you incur for full time/temporary onshore/off shore employees to handle fluctuating volumes of business throughout the year. Training up a team requires time and resource. You will also need to consider the predictability of robotic process automation – an automated process is available around the clock, and is able to scale up or down quickly, according to demand. On average, a robot can handle the volume of three full time employees.

The ability to ramp up a process quickly to manage demand due to business growth or cyclical volume peaks is easily achievable when robotic process automation is implemented to cover selected core processes. This enables companies to meet peaks in demand by dedicating more resource to any process, without recruitment, training requirements or overtime costs.

Robots never give their notice. Calculating recruitment cost savings is a quick and easy way to demonstrate the benefit of robotic process automation to the leadership team. Recruitment may be a specific pain point for one of your decision makers, so be sure to prioritize it early on in your business case.

Look out for our sixth blog in the ABC of RPA series, where we will be discussing how robotics and automation works alongside IT departments.

 
 
About Rita Brunk

Rita Brunk is the Robotics and Automation Transformation Lead for the US at Genfour, the robotic process automation (RPA) and AI delivery specialist. Rita has seven years of automation experience within a shared services environment, which developed to incorporate robotics tools.

Prior to joining Genfour, Rita led a global shared services effort at Hewlett Packard for robotics. She opened and closed various captive shared services sites outside of the US, and several sites under her responsibility won SSON Excellence Awards for value creation in a mature shared series centre.

For the past 15 years, Rita has held a number of executive positions in a captive shared services environment focused on process optimisation and the development of analytics within the finance, HR, logistics, procurement and marketing functions. During this time, Rita oversaw large teams located in Michigan, India, Costa Rica, Argentina and Mexico. For the last two years, she led global efforts to reduce headcounts across all locations, implementing RPA to drive this progress.

 

Comments (0)

This post does not have any comments. Be the first to leave a comment below.


Post A Comment

You must be logged in before you can post a comment. Login now.

Featured Product

BitFlow Introduces 6th Generation Camera Link Frame Grabber: The Axion

BitFlow Introduces 6th Generation Camera Link Frame Grabber: The Axion

BitFlow has offered a Camera Link frame grabbers for almost 15 years. This latest offering, our 6th generation combines the power of CoaXPress with the requirements of Camera Link 2.0. Enabling a single or two camera system to operate at up to 850 MB/S per camera, the Axion-CL family is the best choice for CL frame grabber. Like the Cyton-CXP frame grabber, the Axion-CL leverages features such as the new StreamSync system, a highly optimized DMA engine, and expanded I/O capabilities that provide unprecedented flexibility in routing. There are two options available; Axion 1xE & Axion 2xE. The Axion 1xE is compatible with one base, medium, full or 80-bit camera offering PoCL, Power over Camera Link, on both connectors. The Axion 2xE is compatible with two base, medium, full or 80-bit cameras offering PoCL on both connectors for both cameras. The Axion-CL is a culmination of the continuous improvements and updates BitFlow has made to Camera Link frame grabbers.