In this evolving environment, can trainable robots and cobots go from tradeshow wow factor to actual industrial automation standard components, or will they go the way of Eric and be lost because the industry was too slow to take advantage of the available technology?
Terri Hawker | Kingstar
Listening to NPR the other day, I heard a story about Eric, one of the first UK robots designed in the late 1920s. It amazes me how far we have come in the area of robotics. Back in 1928, a couple guys were able to create a robot that could stand and take a bow. Today, we have robots like Boston Dynamics Atlas that can avoid obstacles and handle irregular objects. (I will admit, however, that these robots are slightly unsettling in real life. Boston Dynamics’ office is across the street from ours, and every once and awhile you will see something walking along in their parking lot that will make you take a second look.)
With all these advances, why is the industrial automation space so slow at adopting new technology? Collaborative machines account for just a small piece of the global industrial robot sales, less than 5%. Why are people in the industrial automation space still thinking about starting new projects with Windows XP?
Way back in 2012, there were systems like Baxter that could coexist on assembly lines with human workers and be trained by people with no technical knowhow. And yet it is not until recently that companies seem to be showing interest, and have started making serious investments into using these types of cobots (collaborative robots) and trainable robots on factory floors. The evidence is all around you; you just have to visit a robotics trade show to see it in action.
Have we finally hit the sweet spot? Are the pieces all coming into alignment to make the industry sit up and take notice? I’m starting to think the answer is yes. Manufacturers are embracing standards like EtherCAT, GenICAM, GigE Vision, Time Sensitive Network, and PLCOpen so they can reduce the cost of hardware and cabling needs to make cobots more economical. The United States is raising efficiency standards for motors, which are requiring companies to rethink their designs and providing the perfect opportunity for including some of these technological advances. And we must not forget about Microsoft and Industry 4.0; they have decided to jump into the fray withWindows 10 IoT Core and cloud-based services like Azure.
In this evolving environment, can trainable robots and cobots go from tradeshow wow factor to actual industrial automation standard components, or will they go the way of Eric and be lost because the industry was too slow to take advantage of the available technology? I certainly hope it’s the former, but we will have to wait and see. In the meantime, Eric is still around… check out his Kickstarter if you have some extra cash.
The content & opinions in this article are the author’s and do not necessarily represent the views of RoboticsTomorrow
KINGSTAR Soft Motion Platform empowers you to dramatically reduce cost, time and complexity of hardware used for precision motion positioning and machine vision systems, with an industrial-grade real-time software-only solution. KINGSTAR's soft motion library and software PLC, built on EtherCAT standards and a real-time 64-bit Windows operating system, accelerate your time-to-market and enhance your efficiency and productivity with PC-based motion controllers for industrial machines.
Symmetric Multiprocessing or Virtualization: Maximizing the Value and Power of a Soft-Control Architecture
This post does not have any comments. Be the first to leave a comment below.
Post A Comment
You must be logged in before you can post a comment. Login now.