Why robotics needs a radical reboot

Laboratory News:  Intelligent robots that operate convincingly within the dynamic chaos of the real world are far from being a reality. For artificial systems to behave anything like living systems we need to fundamentally rethink the standard view of what behaviour is all about says Dr Rupert Young

Living systems employ novel and parsimonious methods which resolve and dissolve many of the seemingly intractable problems faced by conventional robotics.

Generally, standard robotics, including robot arms and self-driving cars, has been viewed as an engineering problem of the geometric manipulation of objects within 3-dimensional space, which requires definition of the equations of motion, within the robotic system, that govern the physics of those objects and worlds.

Moving a robotic arm normally requires predicting in advance what joint angles are required to form a particular pose – which requires equations to compute those angles, along with parametric knowledge such as mass, gravity and length of the limbs. Self-driving cars require detailed mapping of the environment, and algorithms to plan and move objects through its virtual worlds. The trajectories and models are continually adjusted by checking that the real, perceived world matches its predictions.  Full Article:

Featured Product

Boston Dynamics Webinar - Why Humanoids Are the Future of Manufacturing

Boston Dynamics Webinar - Why Humanoids Are the Future of Manufacturing

Join us November 18th for this Webinar as we reflect on what we've learned by observing factory floors, and why we've grown convinced that chasing generalization in manipulation—both in hardware and behavior—isn't just interesting, but necessary. We'll discuss AI research threads we're exploring at Boston Dynamics to push this mission forward, and highlight opportunities our field should collectively invest more in to turn the humanoid vision, and the reinvention of manufacturing, into a practical, economically viable product.