Like anything else, pneumatic robots have associated pros and cons. The case studies and other specifics here indicate how essential it is to evaluate the task at hand and determine whether the process is best carried out with a pneumatic system or another method

The Pros and Cons of Pneumatic Robots

Kayla Matthews | Productivity Bytes

When building robots for companies or buying them for industrial applications, professionals have several choices to make. One of them is the preferred power source. Pneumatic robots are controlled with compressed air. They have advantages and disadvantages, described in detail below.

 

Fluid Movements

One of the perks of pneumatic robots is that they can move quite smoothly. When requiring lifelike robots for films or theme park attractions, the Walt Disney Company often depends on pneumatic robots to provide lifelike experiences for viewers and visitors.

Disney’s experts came up with a pneumatic tube system for characters such as those in its Hall of Presidents attraction, with a transmission stored in a robot’s body instead of its arms. As a result, the movements it makes are fluid and seem real compared to prior non-pneumatic robotics applications that required large, heavy motors.

 

Comparatively Low Safety Risk

In contrast to gas-powered robots that pose explosion and fire risks if they leak, the safety hazards associated with pneumatic robots are low because only air escapes into the environment if there’s a problem.

This advantage is one reason some factories use pneumatic robots in automation applications to speed up the workflow. At its facility in Kansas, Simmons Pet Food depends on an automatic pneumatic system to direct product ingredients through the proper stainless steel channels on the production line.

The plant improved its productivity by 35 percent after expanding its previous pneumatic system. It can now keep facility operations running 24 hours a day.

 

Low-Maintenance Options

Provided the professionals using them make sure the air compressor components are of good quality before investing in a pneumatic robot, these solutions require less maintenance than some other kinds of robots. That characteristic makes them ideal for robots that have lots of moving parts that could wear out.

The YuMi is an industrial machine that can work alongside humans as a collaborative robot or cobot. It has pneumatic grippers capable of handling delicate items, such as produce, as well as a wide assortment of other products.

Most similar grippers include hinges, increasing the possibility that they could wear out. However, the YuMi’s pneumatic gripping system provides the movement with an air pressure and vacuum system, reducing the need for substantial ongoing maintenance. The system’s grippers can even interlock, making them similar to human hands.

 

Less Control of Speed

When a company needs a robotic application that allows for precise tweaks of speed, an electric or liquid-powered system may be preferable to one controlled with air. That’s because pneumatic systems do not allow for as much speed control compared to other options.

Therefore, additional investments may be required to supplement a pneumatic robotics system with other parts that provide for more speed control.

 

Higher Long-Term Operating Costs Than Hydraulics

Pneumatic systems have lower upfront costs compared to hydraulic systems, and that fact makes them initially appealing to businesses trying to keep costs low. However, over time, they could cost five to ten times more to operate than hydraulics.

Although a robot with hydraulic parts will be more expensive than a pneumatic one, it’s also more efficient. That’s because hydraulic systems work at higher pressures, making them compatible with small-scale actuators.

 

Prone to Moisture Buildup

If not cared for properly, pneumatic systems can have short lifespans due to a hidden problem: Condensation.

When moisture builds up inside pneumatic pipes, it can compromise the functionality of the robot and affect how long the equipment lasts. Factors including the humidity and pressure of the supplied air can influence the probability of trapped moisture.

To reduce the occurrence, some facilities use dryers to dehumidify the air before it enters the pneumatic system. However, even that precautionary step is not always successful, especially with the use of small actuators.

Also, condensation increases as the diameter of a pipe increases and the pressure used in the application goes up. Therefore, experts recommend using the smallest pipes and lowest pressure possible. A pipe material with high thermal conductivity, such as copper, can also reduce the amount of moisture in a pneumatic system.

Like anything else, pneumatic robots have associated pros and cons. The case studies and other specifics above indicate how essential it is to evaluate the task at hand and determine whether the process is best carried out with a pneumatic system or one that produces movement with a substance other than air.

 

The content & opinions in this article are the author’s and do not necessarily represent the views of RoboticsTomorrow
Kayla Mathews - Contributing Author

Kayla Mathews - Contributing Author

Matthews is a tech journalist and writer, whose work has appeared on websites such as VentureBeat, The Week, VICE's Motherboard and Inc.com. She is also a senior writer at MakeUseOf and the owner of ProductivityBytes.com.

Other Articles

6 Ways Robotics Can Help Protect Our Oceans
Technology advances have touched almost every industry and process — even those under the seas. Today, experts have robots helping oceans through satellite systems, low-cost sensors, big data and more.
5 More Ways Robots Keep People Safe
Robots may have been accused of stealing jobs, but they're actually doing more than most people realize to keep workers safe as they go about their daily tasks. Let's take a closer look at five more ways that robots are helping to accomplish this.
The Evolution of Robotic Sight and Machine Vision Systems
Robotic sight and machine vision systems can help our automata pick up on visual cues that we humans would probably miss or ignore, and they can deliver considerable value to companies that adopt them. Here’s a look at where the technology has been and where it’s headed.
More about Kayla Mathews - Contributing Author

Comments (0)

This post does not have any comments. Be the first to leave a comment below.


Post A Comment

You must be logged in before you can post a comment. Login now.

Featured Product

BitFlow Introduces 6th Generation Camera Link Frame Grabber: The Axion

BitFlow Introduces 6th Generation Camera Link Frame Grabber: The Axion

BitFlow has offered a Camera Link frame grabbers for almost 15 years. This latest offering, our 6th generation combines the power of CoaXPress with the requirements of Camera Link 2.0. Enabling a single or two camera system to operate at up to 850 MB/S per camera, the Axion-CL family is the best choice for CL frame grabber. Like the Cyton-CXP frame grabber, the Axion-CL leverages features such as the new StreamSync system, a highly optimized DMA engine, and expanded I/O capabilities that provide unprecedented flexibility in routing. There are two options available; Axion 1xE & Axion 2xE. The Axion 1xE is compatible with one base, medium, full or 80-bit camera offering PoCL, Power over Camera Link, on both connectors. The Axion 2xE is compatible with two base, medium, full or 80-bit cameras offering PoCL on both connectors for both cameras. The Axion-CL is a culmination of the continuous improvements and updates BitFlow has made to Camera Link frame grabbers.