Comparing drone inspection time to relevant manual inspections across the 4 sites, we saw an increase in inspection efficiency of 97%. On a per MWdc basis, cost savings due to efficiency gains ranged from $1074 to $1717 per MW, for an average of $1254/MW cost savings.

Case Study: Increasing Solar Inspection Efficiency with Drones

Contributed by | Measure UAS, Inc.

UAV (unmanned aerial vehicles) technologies provide operational efficiency gains to solar asset management. To quantify these gains, Measure compared time, costs, and results of its 100% IR drone inspections to relevant manual inspection scenarios across four solar sites. These comparisons, documented below, yielded the following results:

Drones Increased Efficiency by 97%
Drones Saved an Average of $1,254/MW 

 

Test Site Descriptions

Site 1: 
Preventative maintenance of 74MW in Sunrall, MS
Comparison: Clamp Testing with 20% IV Curve Tracing Testing

 

Site 2: 
Preventative maintenance of 30MW in Spargue, CT
Comparison: Voc/lsc Testing at the Combiner Box with Visual Inspection

 

Site 3: 
System Commissioning for 21MW in Rincon, GA
Comparison: 100% handheld IR scanning with 15% IV Curve Tracing Testing

 

Site 4: 
System Commissioning for 12.5MW in Herald, CA
Comparison: 100% IV Curve Tracing Testing

 

Test Site Conditions

Vetted environmental factors to ensure the highest quality thermal data.

  • Site irradiance greater than 600 watts/m2
  • Wind speed less than 15 mph
  • Cloud cover less than 2/8ths
  • Panel orientation 5 ° – 60 °, where 0 ° is horizontal
  • Solar noon with adjustments made to minimize site shading

 

Data Collection

Grid flight parameters using high overlap settings and high capture frequency are required to create quality orthomosaics. Adjustible settings include altitude, overlap, image ratios, file format, and thermal camera gain setting.

Each site is flown twice, using different sensors and at different altitudes. One flight collects RGB imagery, while a second flight collects thermal imagery. Drone inspection time is 10 min/MW.

GC_gridflight

 

Data Engineering

RGB and thermal data sets are combined and defects are detected using automated processing and manual review. The process includes outlining each individual panel, the identification and geo-location of thermal anomolies, and manual quality control and defect classification. Defects reporting categories include hot spot, sub-module, module, partial string and full string.

BC_Solar_LinkedIn

BC_solar_report_img3

 

Data Delivery

Following processing and analysis, data is delivered to the client in a user-friendly, actionable format. Total time from data collection to data delivery is less than 5 business days.

PDF Inspection Reports: High level, punch list summaries of inspection results.

Online Portal Webmaps: Interactive data hosting platform that includes a visual representation of aerial inspection results and a data set that is exportable, georeferenced, and interactive.

Field Repair Application: Smartphone application that routes technicians to malfunctioning modules and allows corrective maintenance or field validation results to be uploaded while on-site.

OnlineWorkspace

 

Data Accuracy

To test the accuracy of our data, we took the results of a solar inspection by drone and sent out manual inspection on the same plants. The results from the manual inspection mirrored the results from the drone data with 99 percent accuracy, but the manual inspection took two days for each site compared to two hours with the drone.

 

Results

Comparing drone inspection time to relevant manual inspections across the 4 sites, we saw an increase in inspection efficiency of 97%.

On a per MWdc basis, cost savings due to efficiency gains ranged from $1074 to $1717 per MW, for an average of $1254/MW cost savings.

  Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 Site 4
Size 74MW 30MW 21MW 12.5MW
Drone Inspection Time 24 hrs 6 hrs 7 hrs 4 hrs
Manual Inspection Time 778 hrs 293 hrs 208 hrs 195 hrs
Hazardous Man-hours Avoided 754 hrs 287 hrs 201 hrs 191 hrs
Increased Efficiency 97%  98%  97% 98%
Net Cost Savings $68,399 $25,485 $17,063 $19,552

 

In addition, large sites were only a percentage (e.g. 20%) of the facility undergoes IV curve tracing each year will benefit from enhanced revenue opportunities realized through 100% IR scanning. In this case, Site 1 saw an additional $91/MW in enhanced revenue opportunity.

The content & opinions in this article are the author’s and do not necessarily represent the views of RoboticsTomorrow

Comments (0)

This post does not have any comments. Be the first to leave a comment below.


Post A Comment

You must be logged in before you can post a comment. Login now.

Featured Product

ST Robotics Develops the Workspace Sentry for Collaborative Robotics

ST Robotics Develops the Workspace Sentry for Collaborative Robotics

The ST Robotics Workspace Sentry robot and area safety system are based on a small module that sends an infrared beam across the workspace. If the user puts his hand (or any other object) in the workspace, the robot stops using programmable emergency deceleration. Each module has three beams at different angles and the distance a beam reaches is adjustable. Two or more modules can be daisy chained to watch a wider area. "A robot that is tuned to stop on impact may not be safe. Robots where the trip torque can be set at low thresholds are too slow for any practical industrial application. The best system is where the work area has proximity detectors so the robot stops before impact and that is the approach ST Robotics has taken," states President and CEO of ST Robotics David Sands.