The terms accuracy and repeatability are often used interchangeably. However, accuracy is not possible without repeatability, but repeatability is achievable without accuracy. There are other errors, too, non-linearity errors, and linearity errors caused by thermal effects.

Why Repeatability and Accuracy are Different in Motion and Positioning Related Applications
Why Repeatability and Accuracy are Different in Motion and Positioning Related Applications

Contributed by | PI USA

The terms accuracy and repeatability are often used interchangeably.  However, accuracy is not possible without repeatability, but repeatability is achievable without accuracy.  There are other errors, too, non-linearity errors, and linearity errors caused by thermal effects.

Here’s a closer look at the differences and information on what errors can be eliminated by compensation techniques.

Repeatability errors (or lack thereof) allow the motion system to return to the same point in space repeatedly and when approached from any direction; this is called bi-directional repeatability. This type of error cannot be compensated or calibrated, since it is by nature non-repeatable and therefore non-predictable. PI focuses on addressing this type of error when designing and building a motion system. The more repeatable a system can be built, the better the remaining errors can be dealt with through compensation methods.

Repeatability, linearity, and accuracy data can be collected using laser interferometers and custom test software. PI usually employs Zygo and Renishaw interferometers.

In order to get reliable data, high quality metrology equipment is required. For accurate linear measurements, laser interferometers are employed.

A graphic representation of accuracy and repeatability


Non-linear errors are accuracy error motions that do not follow a straight line as the stage moves through its travel range. An example of an accuracy plot for a linear stage is shown below:

Positioning stage accuracy plot. The error (commanded position minus the interferometer measured actual position) is shown on the Y axis and stage position on the X axis. The black line represents the average of multiple test runs, the colored lines are the actual runs. The spread of the data at any one stage location represents the repeatability.


After we perform metrology on a system, we apply error compensation in the motion controller to calibrate (or correct) the repeatable positioning error of the system.  If done well, the black line in the plot becomes a flat line at zero.

Finally, there are linear errors. These are errors that are most commonly caused by thermal expansion effects. As the stage structure and encoders expand and contract with temperature changes, the flat straight line in the plot above becomes a diagonal line. However, since the error is linear, it can easily be addressed by applying a scaling factor to either the motion controller or in a machine vision system. 

If this behavior is a concern for the respective application, a calibration routine can be built into the machine, where the stage is moved to a fixed point in space to look at a fiducial, then is moved to another 2 or 3 fiducials. The errors between the expected locations and measured locations are then calculated. The scale factor can then be adjusted based on these measurements. Such calibrations are usually done periodically, either at a fixed time interval (i.e. every 10 minutes) or in a process interval (i.e. before the start of each batch). Any changes in machine accuracy due to thermal effects are taken care of in this way.

It is not practical, except in very extreme (and costly) cases, to try and build a motion system that holds its accuracy over a wide temperature range without using a calibration routine such as described above.


The content & opinions in this article are the author’s and do not necessarily represent the views of RoboticsTomorrow
PI USA (Physik Instrumente)

PI USA (Physik Instrumente)

PI (Physik Instrumente) provides the broadest and deepest portfolio of precision motion technologies in the world. PI USA complies with the US laws for export controlled technologies.

Other Articles

LIDAR: How Smart Active Alignment Mechanisms can Reduce Manufacturing Costs
Today, tantalizing futuristic transportation applications have motivated this mushrooming industry to develop an impressive array of clever new implementations, accompanied by a wave of investment from venture capitalists, software giants, and established players ...
Gantry Systems for High Performance 3D Printing Applications
3D Printing motion systems are built from standard 3D Print optimized gantry platforms and pre-configured for use with Nordson Ultimus V (or customized to extruder). The direct hardware integration has been considered.
What is the Difference between Hexapod 6-DOF Alignment Systems vs Conventional Stacks of Stages?
When faced with a multi-axis alignment and positioning application, motion engineers typically assemble a system from a stack of individual linear and rotary stages. This approach works well for applications when only a few degrees of freedom are involved (e.g. XYZ).
More about PI USA (Physik Instrumente)

Comments (0)

This post does not have any comments. Be the first to leave a comment below.

Post A Comment

You must be logged in before you can post a comment. Login now.

Featured Product

ATI Industrial Automation - Manual Tool Changers

ATI Industrial Automation - Manual Tool Changers

Simpler, stronger, and more precise. ATI Industrial Automation has developed a series of Manual Tool Changers that provides a cost-effective solution for quickly changing tools by hand. They feature a unique design that combines high strength, excellent repeatability, and a patent-pending screw-cam locking mechanism with multiple fail-safe features, which resists vibration and prevents loosening. These robust and compact Manual Tool Changers can handle payloads up to 80 pounds (36 kg) and pass pneumatics and electrical signals.